diff --git a/context-v/issue-resolutions/Getting-Claude-to-Respond-With-Research.md b/context-v/issue-resolutions/Getting-Claude-to-Respond-With-Research.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..df07de7 --- /dev/null +++ b/context-v/issue-resolutions/Getting-Claude-to-Respond-With-Research.md @@ -0,0 +1,33 @@ + + + + 1. Claude decided not to actually use the tool. The model decides when to search. With tool_choice: + { type: "auto" } (default — what I'm using) and Opus 4.7's training cutoff at January 2026, it + already knows about DevDay 2025, AgentKit, Klarna's two-thirds stat, Salesforce Agentforce, etc. + Its narrative "I'll research this... Let me dig into..." is polite preamble — Claude is + performative there. If it judged it could answer from training, it skipped the actual web_search + tool call entirely. No tool call → no web_search_tool_result blocks → no citations. The fix is one + of: + - tool_choice: { type: "any" } to force at least one tool call (since web_search is the only tool, + that forces a search) + - Or a system prompt: "ALWAYS use the web_search tool to verify and ground every factual claim. Do + not answer from training knowledge." + + 2. Claude DID use the tool but only emitted web_search_tool_result blocks, not per-claim + web_search_result_location citations on text blocks. This happens when the model summarizes + findings narratively rather than attaching formal citations to specific sentences. My original + extractWebCitations only walked text-block citations and missed the result blocks. The fix I + shipped this session adds a fallback that also reads URLs+titles from web_search_tool_result + blocks. After that fix the only way to get zero citations is if Claude didn't search at all. + + Diagnostic path that'll tell us which one is happening — I added console logging this session that + prints block types: [...]; text blocks with citations: N; extracted: N. When you next run Ask + Claude with Obsidian's dev console open (Cmd+Opt+I), the log line tells us: + - If block types contains "web_search_tool_result" → Claude searched. Citations should now extract + via the fallback. + - If block types has no web_search_tool_result → Claude didn't search. We need tool_choice: any or + a system prompt to force it. + + No file edits this turn per your direction. When you've run a test and pasted me the + [ClaudeService] log line, I'll know which fix to make. If you want me to just ship the tool_choice: + any + system-prompt fix preemptively (it'd handle both failure modes), say the word. \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/context-v/issue-resolutions/Widen-Modals-in-Obsidian-using-CSS.md b/context-v/issue-resolutions/Widen-Modals-in-Obsidian-using-CSS.md new file mode 100644 index 0000000..6cb0f9e --- /dev/null +++ b/context-v/issue-resolutions/Widen-Modals-in-Obsidian-using-CSS.md @@ -0,0 +1,687 @@ +--- +title: "Widening (and Re-Sizing) Obsidian Plugin Modals via CSS" +date_authored: 2026-05-02 +status: Resolved +applies_to: Any Obsidian plugin Modal subclass +authored_in_context_of: perplexed → ClaudeModal +related_files: + - src/modals/ClaudeModal.ts + - src/styles/claude-modal.css + - src/styles/perplexity-modal.css # counter-example (narrow) + - src/styles/text-enhancement-modal.css # mixed example (sets max-width on contentEl, partial effect) +--- + +## TL;DR + +The block that controls a Modal's outer width is the **outer DOM element** Obsidian creates for the modal — accessed via `this.modalEl` inside `Modal.onOpen()` — **not** `this.contentEl`. If you add your CSS class to `contentEl` (which is the long-standing convention in plugin examples), your `width` / `max-width` rules apply only to the *inner* content area; the outer `.modal` element keeps Obsidian's default constraints and the modal stays narrow. + +**The one-line fix:** + +```ts +// In Modal.onOpen() +this.modalEl.addClass('my-modal'); // ← attach to the OUTER element +// not: +// this.contentEl.addClass('my-modal'); // ← inner content area only +``` + +**The matching CSS:** + +```css +.my-modal { + width: 90vw; + max-width: 640px; /* or 800px, 960px — whatever your design wants */ +} +``` + +Now `width` actually does what you'd expect. + +--- + +## The Two DOM Elements You Need to Distinguish + +Inside any class extending `Modal` (from `obsidian`), two members are exposed: + +| Field | What it is | Default classes Obsidian adds | +|--------------|------------------------------------------------------|--------------------------------| +| `this.modalEl` | The OUTER container — the popup itself | `.modal` | +| `this.contentEl` | The INNER content area — the slot you fill in | `.modal-content` | + +When Obsidian renders a modal, the DOM hierarchy looks like this (simplified): + +``` + +``` + +Obsidian's stock CSS targets `.modal` (the outer one) for the width constraints. Setting `width: 90vw` on `.modal-content` (the inner one) doesn't override the outer element's constraint — the inner one is just sized to fit *inside* whatever the outer container allows. + +--- + +## Why So Many Plugin Modals Stay Narrow + +The plugin-template convention — repeated across dozens of community plugins — is: + +```ts +onOpen() { + const { contentEl } = this; + contentEl.addClass('my-modal'); // ← the convention + contentEl.createEl('h2', { text: 'My Modal' }); + // … +} +``` + +Then: + +```css +.my-modal { + width: 90vw; /* ← applies to .modal-content; NO EFFECT on outer width */ + max-width: 800px; +} +``` + +The CSS *parses correctly*, the rules *apply*, but the outer `.modal` element is still constrained to ~600px (or whatever Obsidian's theme allows). The inner content area shrinks to fit. You get a narrow modal with extra inner whitespace and conclude "Obsidian doesn't let me size modals." That's the wrong conclusion. + +A real example from this repo shows the partial-fix attempt — `text-enhancement-modal.css`: + +```css +.text-enhancement-modal { + max-width: 800px; /* tries the right values */ + width: 90vw; + /* …but applied to contentEl, so it doesn't override the outer */ +} +``` + +Visually this modal is wider than the bare default because some theme rules let `.modal-content` push its parent open a bit, but it's still not the 800px it asks for. The `claude-modal` is, because it attaches to `modalEl`. + +--- + +## The Fix, in Full + +### Step 1 — attach the class to `modalEl` + +```ts +// src/modals/ClaudeModal.ts (excerpt) +import { App, Modal } from 'obsidian'; + +export class ClaudeModal extends Modal { + onOpen(): void { + const { contentEl, modalEl } = this; + modalEl.addClass('claude-modal'); // ← outer element gets the class + contentEl.empty(); + // …build the body here using contentEl… + } +} +``` + +### Step 2 — set width on the outer element + +```css +.claude-modal { + width: 90vw; + max-width: 640px; +} +``` + +This is enough to widen the modal. Everything below is layout polish on top. + +### Step 3 — kill the default `.modal-content` padding so your own sections control spacing + +Obsidian gives `.modal-content` an internal padding (theme-dependent, often ~20px). Once you build a custom layout with header / sections / footer, that built-in padding fights you. Zero it out and put padding on your own children: + +```css +.claude-modal .modal-content { + padding: 0; +} +``` + +Then each section you build inside `contentEl` gets its own padding: + +```css +.claude-modal__header { padding: 24px 28px 16px; } +.claude-modal__section { padding: 18px 28px 4px; } +.claude-modal__footer { padding: 16px 28px 24px; } +``` + +--- + +## Width Sizing Strategy: `vw` + `max-width` (the right way) + +```css +.claude-modal { + width: 90vw; + max-width: 640px; +} +``` + +**Why both:** + +- `width: 90vw` lets the modal grow with the viewport — feels natural on wide monitors and on a side-pane Obsidian window. On a 1440px screen, that's 1296px (clamped by `max-width`); on a 700px window, it's 630px. +- `max-width: 640px` keeps it from becoming an unreadable full-width slab on a 4K display. Pick the value based on content density: form-style modals like this one work at 600–700px; data tables or side-by-side layouts can go to 900–1100px. + +**Common width budgets that work well:** + +| Modal kind | Suggested `max-width` | +|----------------------------------------|------------------------| +| Single-column form (this modal) | 600–700px | +| Settings-dense form with inline help | 800px | +| Side-by-side / comparison | 960–1100px | +| Full content review (like a paste-in) | `min(95vw, 1200px)` | + +**Avoid** absolute pixel widths without `vw`. A bare `width: 800px` makes the modal hilariously wide on a narrow Obsidian sidepane and tiny-feeling in a maximized window. + +--- + +## Height: usually let it grow naturally + +Don't set a fixed `height` on `.claude-modal`. Obsidian's modal system handles vertical sizing fine — it grows to fit content up to a viewport-relative cap. If you have a large scrollable region inside (say, a long list), constrain *that* with `max-height`, not the whole modal: + +```css +.claude-modal__results-list { + max-height: 50vh; + overflow-y: auto; +} +``` + +If you absolutely need a bounded modal height (rare): + +```css +.claude-modal { + max-height: 85vh; +} + +.claude-modal .modal-content { + /* Let the content area scroll if it overflows */ + max-height: calc(85vh - var(--modal-chrome-height, 60px)); + overflow-y: auto; +} +``` + +But the default behavior is usually right — content-driven modals breathe better when their height isn't capped. + +--- + +## Layout Pattern: header / sections / footer + +Once you've claimed the outer width, the next problem is what to do with all that real estate. The pattern that worked here: + +```html +
+