lllin000_PaperForge/audit/2GN9LMCW/block_trace.csv

52 KiB
Raw Blame History

1pageblock_idraw_labelcontent_previewbboxrolerole_confidenceevidenceseed_roleseed_confidencezonestyle_familymarker_typerender_defaultindex_default
210header_image[67.0, 127.0, 262.0, 313.0]unknown_structural0.2["unrecognized label 'header_image'"]unknown_structural0.2frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likeemptyFalseTrue
311doc_titleIn vitro effect of direct current electrical stimulation on rat mesenchymal stem cells[362.0, 124.0, 1123.0, 264.0]paper_title0.8["page-1 zone title_zone: In vitro effect of direct current electrical stimulation on "]paper_title0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneTrueTrue
412textSahba Mobini $ ^{1,2,*} $, Liudmila Leppik $ ^{1,*} $, Vishnu Thottakkattumana Parameswaran $ ^{1} $ and John Howard Barker $ ^{1} $[361.0, 293.0, 1159.0, 350.0]authors0.8["page-1 zone author_zone: Sahba Mobini $ ^{1,2,*} $, Liudmila Leppik $ ^{1,*} $, Vishn"]authors0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneTrueTrue
513text $ ^{1} $ Frankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, Experimental Orthopedics and Trauma Surgery, Johann Wolfgang Goethe Universität Frankfurt am Main, Frankfurt am Main, Germany[355.0, 361.0, 1119.0, 404.0]affiliation0.8["page-1 zone affiliation_zone: $ ^{1} $ Frankfurt Initiative for Regenerative Medicine, Exp"]affiliation0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likeaffiliation_markerTrueTrue
614text $ ^{2} $School of Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Physical Sciences, University of Manchester, Manchester, United Kingdom[355.0, 406.0, 1126.0, 447.0]affiliation0.8["page-1 zone affiliation_zone: $ ^{2} $School of Materials, Faculty of Engineering and Phys"]affiliation0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likeaffiliation_markerTrueTrue
715textThese authors contributed equally to this work.[357.0, 449.0, 712.0, 472.0]frontmatter_support0.78["first-surviving-page support text: These authors contributed equally to this work."]frontmatter_support0.78frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneTrueTrue
816paragraph_titleABSTRACT[388.0, 510.0, 548.0, 539.0]abstract_heading0.95["abstract heading"]abstract_heading0.95frontmatter_main_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
917textSubmitted 12 July 2016 Accepted 22 November 2016 Published 12 January 2017[65.0, 948.0, 295.0, 1014.0]frontmatter_noise0.8["page-1 zone journal_furniture_zone: Submitted 12 July 2016\nAccepted 22 November 2016\nPublished 1"]frontmatter_noise0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneFalseFalse
1018abstractBackground. Electrical stimulation (ES) has been successfully used to treat bone defects clinically. Recently, both cellular and molecular approaches have demonstrated that ES can change cell behavior[383.0, 555.0, 1148.0, 1036.0]abstract_body0.85["abstract label from Paddle OCR"]abstract_body0.85frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneTrueTrue
1119textcc Copyright 2017 Mobini et al.[67.0, 1284.0, 202.0, 1333.0]frontmatter_noise0.8["page-1 zone journal_furniture_zone: cc Copyright 2017 Mobini et al."]frontmatter_noise0.8body_zonesupport_likenoneFalseFalse
12110textOPEN ACCESS[70.0, 1408.0, 209.0, 1432.0]frontmatter_noise0.7["frontmatter noise text: OPEN ACCESS"]frontmatter_noise0.7body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
13111textDistributed under Creative Commons CC-BY 4.0[64.0, 1346.0, 316.0, 1391.0]frontmatter_noise0.8["page-1 zone journal_furniture_zone: Distributed under\nCreative Commons CC-BY 4.0"]frontmatter_noise0.8body_zonebody_likenoneFalseFalse
14112textAdditional Information and Declarations can be found on page 10[65.0, 1172.0, 306.0, 1238.0]frontmatter_noise0.8["page-1 zone journal_furniture_zone: Additional Information and Declarations can be found on page"]frontmatter_noise0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneFalseFalse
15113textCorresponding author Sahba Mobini, sahba.mobini@manchester.ac.uk, sahba.mobini@gmail.com[64.0, 1023.0, 315.0, 1111.0]frontmatter_support0.78["first-surviving-page support text: Corresponding author\nSahba Mobini,\nsahba.mobini@manchester.a"]frontmatter_support0.78frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneTrueTrue
16114textDOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[66.0, 1247.0, 249.0, 1271.0]frontmatter_noise0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneFalseFalse
17115textAcademic editor Jalees Rehman[65.0, 1120.0, 203.0, 1165.0]frontmatter_noise0.8["page-1 zone journal_furniture_zone: Academic editor\nJalees Rehman"]frontmatter_noise0.8frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneFalseFalse
18116textSubjects Bioengineering, Cell Biology, Orthopedics[362.0, 1087.0, 788.0, 1112.0]frontmatter_noise0.7["keyword-like block: Subjects Bioengineering, Cell Biology, Orthopedics"]frontmatter_noise0.7frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneFalseFalse
19117textKeywords Direct current electrical stimulation, Bone marrow-derived mesenchymal stem cells, Adipose tissue-derived mesenchymal stem cells, Bone tissue engineering[361.0, 1114.0, 1136.0, 1166.0]frontmatter_noise0.7["keyword-like block: Keywords Direct current electrical stimulation, Bone marrow-"]frontmatter_noise0.7frontmatter_main_zonesupport_likenoneFalseFalse
20118paragraph_titleINTRODUCTION[363.0, 1201.0, 585.0, 1231.0]section_heading0.9["explicit scholarly heading: INTRODUCTION"]section_heading0.9body_zoneheading_likecanonical_section_nameTrueTrue
21119textLarge segment bone defects, caused by open fractures, non-unions, infections and tumor resection are a major challenge in trauma and orthopedic surgery. Complications associated with current treatment[361.0, 1245.0, 1159.0, 1423.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
22120footerHow to cite this article Mobini et al. (2017), In vitro effect of direct current electrical stimulation on rat mesenchymal stem cells. PeerJ 5:e2821; DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[362.0, 1497.0, 1143.0, 1534.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likenoneFalseFalse
2320headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9frontmatter_side_zonesupport_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
2421texthold great potential for achieving optimal bone healing while eliminating the associated drawbacks of conventional treatments (Petite et al., 2000).[361.0, 167.0, 1149.0, 223.0]unknown_structural0.8["page-1 zone author_zone: hold great potential for achieving optimal bone healing whil"]authors0.8body_zonebody_likenoneFalseTrue
2522textMesenchymal stem cells (MSCs) have been shown to be an attractive cell source for clinical bone tissue engineering applications. MSCs possess a great capacity for self-renewal and multi-lineage differ[361.0, 226.0, 1162.0, 758.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
2623textElectrical stimulation (ES) has been shown to be effective in nerve and cardiac tissue engineering applications, primarily due to the electric nature of these tissues (Ghasemi-Mobarakeh et al., 2011; [362.0, 760.0, 1159.0, 1379.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
2724textRecently, various different types of physical stimuli such as static magnetic fields, cyclic strain, low frequency vibration, and electric signals have been used to improve[362.0, 1382.0, 1133.0, 1439.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
2825footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[63.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9frontmatter_main_zonereference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
2926number2/15[1117.0, 1503.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
3030headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
3131textboth the proliferative and the differentiation potential of stem cells. Specifically, ES has been shown to influence cell proliferation and differentiation in tissue engineering applications (Balint, [361.0, 167.0, 1163.0, 670.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
3232textIn the present study we exposed rat BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs to DC ES and compared osteogenic differentiation behavior in both cell types.[363.0, 673.0, 1156.0, 730.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
3333paragraph_titleMATERIALS AND METHODS Groups[363.0, 756.0, 748.0, 824.0]section_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level section_heading: MATERIALS AND METHODS Groups"]section_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
3434footer[364.0, 796.0, 459.0, 824.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeemptyFalseFalse
3535textWe designed our experiments to compare electrically stimulated (ES) versus not stimulated (Control) cell groups. Each group included both BM- and AT-derived rat MSCs, cultivated in osteogenic differen[362.0, 827.0, 1161.0, 977.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
3636paragraph_titleCell preparation and culture[364.0, 991.0, 692.0, 1020.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Cell preparation and culture"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
3737textSprague-Dawley (SD) rat MSC from bone marrow (RASMX-01001) and adipose tissue (RASMD-01001) were both obtained from Cyagen (CA, USA). Frozen vials of cells were thawed, cultured, and expanded to reach[362.0, 1024.0, 1160.0, 1439.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
3838footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[63.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
3939number3/15[1116.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
4040headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 108.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
4141image[364.0, 176.0, 1154.0, 564.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: image"]media_asset0.85body_zonebody_likeemptyTrueTrue
4242figure_titleFigure 1 Setup for delivering direct current electrical stimulation to the cells. L-shaped platinum electrodes, 22 mm apart, secured to the lid of a 6-well cell culture plate and connected to a standa[373.0, 585.0, 1147.0, 675.0]figure_caption0.92["figure_title label: Figure 1 Setup for delivering direct current electrical stim"]figure_caption0.92display_zonelegend_likefigure_numberTrueTrue
4343paragraph_titleElectrical stimulation of cells[363.0, 702.0, 703.0, 728.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Electrical stimulation of cells"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
4444textElectrical stimulation was applied by means of a purpose built DC ES cell culture chamber (Mobini, Leppik & Barker, 2016). Briefly, the chamber consists of L-shaped platinum electrodes, separated by a[360.0, 733.0, 1161.0, 1033.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
4545paragraph_titleCell viability and activity[363.0, 1048.0, 652.0, 1076.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Cell viability and activity"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
4646textTo confirm that the oxidationreduction and electrochemical reactions of the metallic electrodes in the DC ES chamber were not cytotoxic, cell viability and metabolic activity were assessed by 3-(4,5-[360.0, 1081.0, 1161.0, 1379.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
4747footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
4848number4/15[1117.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
4950headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
5051paragraph_titleOsteogenic differentiation[362.0, 165.0, 669.0, 192.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Osteogenic differentiation"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
5152textAlizarin Red stains calcium deposits in the cells, indicating the presence of functional osteocytes. Cultured cells were washed twice with PBS and fixed with 4% paraformaldehyde (Sigma Aldrich, Münche[361.0, 197.0, 1161.0, 403.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
5253textTranscription quantitative Polymerase Chain Reaction (RT-qPCR) technique. In brief, total RNA was isolated using an Aurum RNA isolation kit (BioRad, München, Germany) according to the manufacturer's i[360.0, 417.0, 1159.0, 1151.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
5354paragraph_titleData analysis[364.0, 1169.0, 525.0, 1196.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Data analysis"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
5455textAll experiments were performed in triplicate and statistical significance of differences between groups was analyzed by one-way ANOVA and student t-test using GraphPad Prism (GraphPad Software Inc, La[362.0, 1200.0, 1158.0, 1410.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
5556footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[63.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
5657number5/15[1117.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
5760headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
5861image[366.0, 170.0, 1153.0, 859.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: image"]media_asset0.85body_zonebody_likeemptyTrueTrue
5962figure_titleFigure 2 Calcium deposition. Calcium deposition stained using Alizarin Red S for; (A) BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs exposed to no electrical stimulation (controls) at days 7 and 14; (B) BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs expo[373.0, 882.0, 1149.0, 1019.0]figure_caption0.92["figure_title label: Figure 2 Calcium deposition. Calcium deposition stained usin"]figure_caption0.92display_zonelegend_likefigure_numberTrueTrue
6063textin growth medium at day 0). Standard deviation (SD) was calculated with the $ \Delta C_{q} $ value of technical triplicates.[362.0, 1049.0, 1154.0, 1107.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
6164paragraph_titleRESULTS Electrical stimulation optimization[363.0, 1135.0, 760.0, 1204.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: RESULTS Electrical stimulation optimization"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
6265footer[363.0, 1175.0, 760.0, 1204.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeemptyFalseFalse
6366textIn order to optimize the electrical stimulation regime, first we exposed cells in culture to 10, 50, 100, and 200 mV/mm of DC ES for 1 h and found that 200 mV/mm caused cell lysis due to electro-chemi[362.0, 1208.0, 1158.0, 1387.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
6467footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 495.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
6568number6/15[1117.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1523.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
6670headerPeerJ[61.0, 70.0, 156.0, 108.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
6771chart[372.0, 171.0, 1043.0, 729.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zonebody_likeemptyTrueTrue
6872figure_titleFigure 3 Cell viability. Measured by MTT assay, compared between electrically stimulated and non-stimulated controls. No significant difference in cell viability was detected between ES and non-stimul[373.0, 749.0, 1147.0, 840.0]figure_caption0.92["figure_title label: Figure 3 Cell viability. Measured by MTT assay, compared bet"]figure_caption0.92display_zonelegend_likefigure_numberTrueTrue
6973paragraph_titleCell viability and activity[363.0, 870.0, 651.0, 899.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Cell viability and activity"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
7074textMTT assay was performed to compare viability and activity of electrically stimulated cells vs. non-stimulated controls. None of the cells exposed to 10, 50 and 100 mV/mm showed signs of toxicity. Figu[360.0, 903.0, 1155.0, 1170.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
7175paragraph_titleOsteogenic differentiation[363.0, 1187.0, 669.0, 1215.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Osteogenic differentiation"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
7276textThe influence of electrical stimulation on osteogenic differentiation of rat AT- and BM-MSCs in culture were investigated after seven and 14 days and compared to controls. Figures 2A and 2B shows Aliz[361.0, 1219.0, 1146.0, 1427.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
7377footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[63.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
7478number7/15[1117.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1523.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
7580headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
7681text(10 and 50 mV/mm) electrical fields, was not significant. However, initial morphological changes in both cell types were present at day 7, in cells exposed to electrical field of 50 mV/mm (Figs. 2C an[362.0, 167.0, 1153.0, 252.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
7782textOsteogenic phenotype gene expression was investigated by means of RT-qPCR analysis, in both ES and control groups of AT-MSCs and BM-MSCs at three, seven, and 14 days, (Fig. 4). In both BM- and AT-MSCs[361.0, 256.0, 1161.0, 608.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
7883paragraph_titleDISCUSSION[364.0, 629.0, 546.0, 659.0]section_heading0.9["explicit scholarly heading: DISCUSSION"]section_heading0.9body_zoneheading_likecanonical_section_nameTrueTrue
7984textEarly studies exposing bone cells to DC electrical fields were in 1980s when Ferrier et al. (1986) exposed osteoblast-like cells to a 100 mV/mm electrical stimulation and observed cell migration towar[361.0, 674.0, 1161.0, 1054.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
8085textWith the aim of better understanding these DC ES induced changes in MSCs osteogenic differentiation behavior, we exposed rat BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs to 100 mV/mm 1 h/day DC ES for three, seven and 14 days[362.0, 1057.0, 1161.0, 1378.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
8186textWe showed that in the presence of DC ES, BM-MSCs and AT-MSCs behave differently as it relates to osteogenic marker expression. These observations could be related to[362.0, 1382.0, 1159.0, 1438.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
8287footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[63.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
8388number8/15[1117.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
8490headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 155.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
8591vision_footnoteNo Electrical Stimulation Electrical Stimulation 100 mV/mm[449.0, 168.0, 738.0, 219.0]footnote0.7["vision_footnote label: No Electrical Stimulation\nElectrical Stimulation 100 mV/mm"]footnote0.7body_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
8692chart[429.0, 237.0, 733.0, 485.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zoneunknown_likeemptyTrueTrue
8793chart[772.0, 238.0, 1071.0, 484.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zoneunknown_likeemptyTrueTrue
8894chart[363.0, 504.0, 742.0, 757.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zonebody_likeemptyTrueTrue
8995chart[766.0, 503.0, 1075.0, 750.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zoneunknown_likeemptyTrueTrue
9096chart[428.0, 774.0, 729.0, 1016.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zoneunknown_likeemptyTrueTrue
9197chart[765.0, 768.0, 1075.0, 1013.0]figure_asset0.85["media label: chart"]media_asset0.85body_zoneunknown_likeemptyTrueTrue
9298figure_titleDays post culture in osteogenic differentiation supplemented medium[374.0, 1046.0, 1143.0, 1077.0]figure_caption_candidate0.85["figure_title label: Days post culture in osteogenic differentiation supplemented"]figure_caption0.85body_zonelegend_likenoneFalseFalse
9399textFigure 4 RT-qPCR results. Temporal changes in messenger RNA (mRNA) of (A) Runx2, (B) Osteopontin, (C) Collagen Type1 (Col1A2) in BM-MSCs; (D) Runx2, (E) Osteopontin and (F) Col1A2 in AT-MSCs, in both [373.0, 1101.0, 1143.0, 1258.0]figure_caption0.9["figure prefix matched: Figure 4 RT-qPCR results. Temporal changes in messenger RNA ", "long text, reduced confidence", "near figure media assets"]figure_caption0.9display_zonelegend_likefigure_numberTrueTrue
94910footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 495.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
95911number9/15[1117.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
96100headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 108.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
97101textthe known differences in osteogenic differentiation capacity between BM- and AT-derived MSC. Namely, studies that suggest AT-MSCs have less osteogenic potential than BM-MSCs (Ratanavaraporn et al., 20[361.0, 167.0, 1162.0, 313.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
98102textOur results indicate that in control groups (osteogenic supplemented medium, without electrical stimulation), both in BM- and AT-MSCs, only a slight difference exists in temporal expression patterns o[362.0, 317.0, 1161.0, 462.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
99103textRunx2 is known as a master osteogenic transcription factor. Runx2 activates and regulates osteogenesis as the targeted gene of many signaling pathways, including transforming growth factor-beta 1 (TGF[361.0, 465.0, 1161.0, 914.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
100104paragraph_titleCONCLUSIONS[364.0, 939.0, 578.0, 970.0]section_heading0.9["explicit scholarly heading: CONCLUSIONS"]section_heading0.9body_zoneheading_likecanonical_section_nameTrueTrue
101105textWe have demonstrated that DC ES promotes Runx2, Osteopontin and Col1A2 expression in BM-MSCs already at 7 days. Our results indicate that DC ES effects osteogenic gene expression, in both BM- and AT-M[361.0, 983.0, 1158.0, 1192.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
102106paragraph_titleADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DECLARATIONS[371.0, 1224.0, 1050.0, 1256.0]body_paragraph0.5["backmatter boundary candidate: ADDITIONAL INFORMATION AND DECLARATIONS"]backmatter_boundary_candidate0.5body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
103107paragraph_titleFunding[364.0, 1287.0, 466.0, 1316.0]sub_subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level sub_subsection_heading: Funding"]sub_subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
104108textThe work described herein was supported in part by a grant from the AO Foundation (#S-14-03H) and from the Friedrichsheim Foundation (Stiftung Friedrichsheim) in Frankfurt/Main, Germany. The funders h[362.0, 1319.0, 1149.0, 1439.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
105109footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 496.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
1061010number10/15[1108.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1523.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9body_zonebody_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
107110headerPeerJ[62.0, 72.0, 155.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9body_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
108111paragraph_titleGrant Disclosures[364.0, 164.0, 578.0, 191.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Grant Disclosures"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
109112textThe following grant information was disclosed by the authors: AO Foundation: #S-14-03H. Friedrichsheim Foundation.[363.0, 197.0, 917.0, 280.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
110113paragraph_titleCompeting Interests[364.0, 303.0, 604.0, 330.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Competing Interests"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
111114textThe authors declare there are no competing interests.[363.0, 336.0, 838.0, 361.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
112115paragraph_titleAuthor Contributions[365.0, 380.0, 614.0, 406.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Author Contributions"]subsection_heading0.6body_zonesupport_likenoneTrueTrue
113116text● Sahba Mobini and Liudmila Leppik conceived and designed the experiments, performed the experiments, analyzed the data, wrote the paper, prepared figures and/or tables, reviewed drafts of the paper.[364.0, 413.0, 1158.0, 497.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
114117text- Vishnu Thottakkattumana Parameswaran performed the experiments, prepared figures and/or tables.[364.0, 502.0, 1157.0, 556.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
115118text● John Howard Barker contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools, wrote the paper, reviewed drafts of the paper.[365.0, 563.0, 1138.0, 618.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
116119paragraph_titleData Availability[365.0, 637.0, 556.0, 665.0]subsection_heading0.6["unnumbered paragraph_title, inferred level subsection_heading: Data Availability"]subsection_heading0.6body_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
1171110textThe following information was supplied regarding data availability:[364.0, 670.0, 961.0, 696.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
1181111textThe raw data has been supplied as Supplementary Files.[388.0, 701.0, 884.0, 726.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
1191112paragraph_titleSupplemental Information[364.0, 745.0, 667.0, 774.0]backmatter_heading0.5["backmatter boundary candidate: Supplemental Information"]backmatter_boundary_candidate0.5body_zoneheading_likenoneTrueTrue
1201113textSupplemental information for this article can be found online at http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.2821#supplemental-information.[363.0, 778.0, 1158.0, 835.0]body_paragraph0.6["default body_paragraph for text label"]body_paragraph0.6body_zonebody_likenoneTrueTrue
1211114paragraph_titleREFERENCES[365.0, 874.0, 562.0, 904.0]reference_heading0.9["references heading: REFERENCES"]reference_heading0.9reference_zoneheading_likeshort_fragmentTrueTrue
1221115reference_contentAmini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. 2012. Bone tissue engineering: recent advances and challenges. Critical Reviews in Biomedical Engineering 40:363408. DOI 10.1615/CritRevBiomedEng.v40.i5.10.[369.0, 925.0, 1106.0, 1008.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Amini AR, Laurencin CT, Nukavarapu SP. 2012. Bone tissue eng"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1231116reference_contentBalint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. 2013. Electrical stimulation: a novel tool for tissue engineering. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 19:4857. DOI 10.1089/ten.TEB.2012.0183.[371.0, 1016.0, 1126.0, 1096.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Cartmell SH. 2013. Electrical stimulat"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1241117reference_contentBalint R, Cassidy NJ, Hidalgo-Bastida LA, Cartmell S. 2013. Electrical stimulation enhanced mesenchymal stem cell gene expression for orthopaedic tissue repair. Journal of Biomaterials and Tissue Engi[370.0, 1105.0, 1155.0, 1189.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Balint R, Cassidy NJ, Hidalgo-Bastida LA, Cartmell S. 2013. "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1251118reference_contentBodamyali T, Bhatt B, Hughes FJ, Winrow VR, Kanczler JM, Simon B, Abbott J, Blake DR, Stevens CR. 1998. Pulsed electromagnetic fields simultaneously induce osteogenesis and upregulate transcription of[371.0, 1195.0, 1130.0, 1337.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Bodamyali T, Bhatt B, Hughes FJ, Winrow VR, Kanczler JM, Sim"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1261119reference_contentBunnell BA, Flaat M, Gagliardi C, Patel B, Ripoll C. 2008. Adipose-derived stem cells: isolation, expansion and differentiation. Methods 45:115120 DOI 10.1016/j.ymeth.2008.03.006.[370.0, 1344.0, 1130.0, 1427.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Bunnell BA, Flaat M, Gagliardi C, Patel B, Ripoll C. 2008. A"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1271120footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 494.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_zonereference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
1281121number11/15[1109.0, 1503.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9tail_nonref_hold_zoneunknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
129120headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
130121reference_contentColnot C. 2011. Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: insights from basic science. Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 17:449457 DOI 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0243.[368.0, 167.0, 1113.0, 222.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Colnot C. 2011. Cell sources for bone tissue engineering: in"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
131122reference_contentCowan CM, Shi YY, Aalami OO, Chou YF, Mari C, Thomas R, Quarto N, Contag CH, Wu B, Longaker MT. 2004. Adipose-derived adult stromal cells heal critical-size mouse calvarial defects. Nature Biotechnolo[369.0, 227.0, 1136.0, 311.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Cowan CM, Shi YY, Aalami OO, Chou YF, Mari C, Thomas R, Quar"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
132123reference_contentCurtis KM, Gomez LA, Rios C, Garbayo E, Raval AP, Perez-Pinzon MA, Schiller PC. 2010. EF1alpha and RPL13a represent normalization genes suitable for RT-qPCR analysis of bone marrow derived mesenchymal[370.0, 317.0, 1128.0, 430.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Curtis KM, Gomez LA, Rios C, Garbayo E, Raval AP, Perez-Pinz"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
133124reference_contentDe Girolamo L, Sartori MF, Albisetti W, Brini AT. 2007. Osteogenic differentiation of human adipose-derived stem cells: comparison of two different inductive media. Journal of Tissue Engineering and R[370.0, 436.0, 1094.0, 549.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: De Girolamo L, Sartori MF, Albisetti W, Brini AT. 2007. Oste"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
134125reference_contentFerrier J, Ross SM, Kanehisa J, Aubin JE. 1986. Osteoclasts and osteoblasts migrate in opposite directions in response to a constant electrical-field. Journal of Cellular Physiology 129:283288 DOI 10[370.0, 556.0, 1124.0, 640.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Ferrier J, Ross SM, Kanehisa J, Aubin JE. 1986. Osteoclasts "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
135126reference_contentFlorencio-Silva R, Sasso GRD, Sasso-Cerri E, Simoes MJ, Cerri PS. 2015. Biology of bone tissue: structure, function, and factors that influence bone cells. Biomed Research International 2015: Article [370.0, 645.0, 1112.0, 730.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Florencio-Silva R, Sasso GRD, Sasso-Cerri E, Simoes MJ, Cerr"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
136127reference_contentFu YC, Lin CC, Chang JK, Chen CH, Tai IC, Wang GJ, Ho ML. 2014. A novel single pulsed electromagnetic field stimulates osteogenesis of bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells and bone repair. PLOS ONE 9:e9[370.0, 736.0, 1155.0, 820.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Fu YC, Lin CC, Chang JK, Chen CH, Tai IC, Wang GJ, Ho ML. 20"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
137128reference_contentFukada E, Yasuda I. 1957. On the piezoelectric effect of bone. Journal of the Physical Society of Japan 12:11581162 DOI 10.1143/JPSJ.12.1158.[369.0, 825.0, 1114.0, 879.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Fukada E, Yasuda I. 1957. On the piezoelectric effect of bon"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
138129reference_contentGamie Z, MacFarlane RJ, Tomkinson A, Moniakis A, Tran GT, Gamie Y, Mantalaris A, Tsiridis E. 2014. Skeletal tissue engineering using mesenchymal or embryonic stem cells: clinical and experimental data[370.0, 885.0, 1129.0, 998.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Gamie Z, MacFarlane RJ, Tomkinson A, Moniakis A, Tran GT, Ga"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1391210reference_contentGhasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahani MH, Baharvand H, Kiani S, Al-Deyab SS, Ramakrishna S. 2011. Application of conductive polymers, scaffolds and electrical stimulation for n[369.0, 1004.0, 1154.0, 1119.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Ghasemi-Mobarakeh L, Prabhakaran MP, Morshed M, Nasr-Esfahan"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
1401211reference_contentGriffin M, Bayat A. 2011. Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence. Eplasty 11:e34.[369.0, 1123.0, 1102.0, 1179.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Griffin M, Bayat A. 2011. Electrical stimulation in bone hea"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1411212reference_contentGrottkau BE, Lin Y. 2013. Osteogenesis of adipose-derived stem cells. Bone Research 1:133145 DOI 10.4248/BR201302003.[370.0, 1184.0, 1112.0, 1237.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Grottkau BE, Lin Y. 2013. Osteogenesis of adipose-derived st"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1421213reference_contentHammerick KE, James AW, Huang ZB, Prinz FB, Longaker MT. 2010. Pulsed direct current electric fields enhance osteogenesis in adipose-derived stromal cells. Tissue Engineering Part A 16:917931 DOI 10.[370.0, 1244.0, 1135.0, 1328.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Hammerick KE, James AW, Huang ZB, Prinz FB, Longaker MT. 201"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1431214reference_contentHaque N, Rahman MT, Abu Kasim NH, Alabsi AM. 2013. Hypoxic culture conditions as a solution for mesenchymal stem cell based regenerative therapy. Scientific World Journal 2013: Article 632972 DOI 10.1[369.0, 1334.0, 1143.0, 1418.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Haque N, Rahman MT, Abu Kasim NH, Alabsi AM. 2013. Hypoxic c"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1441215footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 494.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_zonereference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
1451216number12/15[1109.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
146130headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
147131reference_contentHardy JG, Villancio-Wolter MK, Sukhavasi RC, Mouser DJ, Aguilar Jr D, Geissler SA, Kaplan DL, Schmidt CE. 2015. Electrical stimulation of human mesenchymal stem cells on conductive nanofibers enhances[370.0, 167.0, 1106.0, 309.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Hardy JG, Villancio-Wolter MK, Sukhavasi RC, Mouser DJ, Agui"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
148132reference_contentHu WW, Hsu YT, Cheng YC, Li C, Ruaan RC, Chien CC, Chung CA, Tsao CW. 2014. Electrical stimulation to promote osteogenesis using conductive polypyrrole films. Materials Science & Engineering C—Materia[370.0, 316.0, 1132.0, 430.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Hu WW, Hsu YT, Cheng YC, Li C, Ruaan RC, Chien CC, Chung CA,"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
149133reference_contentJaiswal N, Haynesworth SE, Caplan AI, Bruder SP. 1997. Osteogenic differentiation of purified, culture-expanded human mesenchymal stem cells in vitro. Journal of Cellular Biochemistry 64:295312 DOI 1[370.0, 436.0, 1147.0, 548.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Jaiswal N, Haynesworth SE, Caplan AI, Bruder SP. 1997. Osteo"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
150134reference_contentJames AW. 2013. Review of signaling pathways governing MSC osteogenic and adipogenic differentiation. Scientifica 2013:684736 DOI 10.1155/2013/684736.[369.0, 555.0, 1103.0, 612.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: James AW. 2013. Review of signaling pathways governing MSC o"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
151135reference_contentLeppik LP, Froemel D, Slavici A, Ovadia ZN, Hudak L, Henrich D, Marzi I, Barker JH. 2015. Effects of electrical stimulation on rat limb regeneration, a new look at an old model. Scientific Reports 5: [370.0, 615.0, 1142.0, 700.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Leppik LP, Froemel D, Slavici A, Ovadia ZN, Hudak L, Henrich"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
152136reference_contentLevin M. 2009. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: unique aspects and future perspectives. Seminars in Cell and Developmental Biology 20:543556 DOI 10.1016/j.semcdb.2009.04.013.[370.0, 705.0, 1065.0, 789.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Levin M. 2009. Bioelectric mechanisms in regeneration: uniqu"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
153137reference_contentLiu TM, Martina M, Hutmacher DW, Hui JHP, Lee EH, Lim B. 2007. Identification of common pathways mediating differentiation of bone marrow- and adipose tissue-derived human mesenchymal stem cells into [369.0, 795.0, 1148.0, 908.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Liu TM, Martina M, Hutmacher DW, Hui JHP, Lee EH, Lim B. 200"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
154138reference_contentLivak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene expression data using real-time quantitative PCR and the 2(-Delta Delta C(T)) Method. Methods 25:402408. DOI 10.1006/meth.2001.1262.[370.0, 915.0, 1135.0, 998.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Livak KJ, Schmittgen TD. 2001. Analysis of relative gene exp"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
155139reference_contentMarycz K, Lewandowski D, Tomaszewski KA, Henry BM, Golee EB, Maredziak M. 2016. Low-frequency, low-magnitude vibrations (LFLM) enhances chondrogenic differentiation potential of human adipose derived [369.0, 1004.0, 1142.0, 1118.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Marycz K, Lewandowski D, Tomaszewski KA, Henry BM, Golee EB,"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1561310reference_contentMcCullen SD, McQuilling JP, Grossfeld RM, Lubischer JL, Clarke LI, Loboa EG. 2010. Application of low-frequency alternating current electric fields via interdigitated electrodes: effects on cellular v[369.0, 1124.0, 1143.0, 1266.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: McCullen SD, McQuilling JP, Grossfeld RM, Lubischer JL, Clar"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
1571311reference_contentMobini S, Leppik L, Barker JH. 2016. Direct current electrical stimulation chamber for treating cells in vitro. Biotechniques 60:9598 DOI 10.2144/000114382.[370.0, 1274.0, 1137.0, 1328.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Mobini S, Leppik L, Barker JH. 2016. Direct current electric"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1581312reference_contentMusina RA, Bekchanova ES, Belyavskii AV, Sukhikh GT. 2006. Differentiation potential of mesenchymal stem cells of different origin. Bulletin of Experimental Biology and Medicine 141:147151 DOI 10.100[369.0, 1334.0, 1154.0, 1417.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Musina RA, Bekchanova ES, Belyavskii AV, Sukhikh GT. 2006. D"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1591313footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 494.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_zonereference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
1601314number13/15[1108.0, 1502.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
161140headerPeerJ[61.0, 71.0, 156.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
162141reference_contentNakamura A, Dohi Y, Akahane M, Ohgushi H, Nakajima H, Funaoka H, Takakura Y. 2009. Osteocalcin secretion as an early marker of in vitro osteogenic differentiation of rat mesenchymal stem cells. Tissue[370.0, 167.0, 1138.0, 280.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Nakamura A, Dohi Y, Akahane M, Ohgushi H, Nakajima H, Funaok"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
163142reference_contentPelto J, Bjorninen M, Palli A, Talvitie E, Hyttinen J, Mannerstrom B, Suuronen Seppanen R, Kellomaki M, Miettinen S, Haimi S. 2013. Novel polypyrrole-coated polylactide scaffolds enhance adipose stem [370.0, 286.0, 1154.0, 401.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Pelto J, Bjorninen M, Palli A, Talvitie E, Hyttinen J, Manne"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
164143reference_contentPeng L, Jia Z, Yin X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Chen P, Ma K, Zhou C. 2008. Comparative analysis of mesenchymal stem cells from bone marrow, cartilage, and adipose tissue. Stem Cells and Development 17:761773 [370.0, 407.0, 1154.0, 490.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Peng L, Jia Z, Yin X, Zhang X, Liu Y, Chen P, Ma K, Zhou C. "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
165144reference_contentPetite H, Viateau V, Bensaid W, Meunier A, De Pollak C, Bourguignon M, Oudina K, Sedel L, Guillemin G. 2000. Tissue-engineered bone regeneration. Nature Biotechnology 18:959963 DOI 10.1038/79449.[370.0, 496.0, 1112.0, 579.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Petite H, Viateau V, Bensaid W, Meunier A, De Pollak C, Bour"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
166145reference_contentRatanavaraporn J, Kanokpanont S, Tabata Y, Damrongsakkul S. 2009. Growth and osteogenic differentiation of adipose-derived and bone marrow-derived stem cells on chitosan and chitooligosaccharide films[370.0, 585.0, 1130.0, 699.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Ratanavaraporn J, Kanokpanont S, Tabata Y, Damrongsakkul S. "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
167146reference_contentRobey PG. 2011. Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good, the bad, and the ugly (but promising). Tissue Engineering Part B: Reviews 17:423430 DOI 10.1089/ten.teb.2011.0199.[370.0, 705.0, 1150.0, 788.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Robey PG. 2011. Cell sources for bone regeneration: the good"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
168147reference_contentRoss CL, Siriwardane M, Almeida-Porada G, Porada CD, Brink P, Christ GJ, Harrison BS. 2015. The effect of low-frequency electromagnetic field on human bone marrow stem/progenitor cell differentiation.[371.0, 795.0, 1112.0, 908.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Ross CL, Siriwardane M, Almeida-Porada G, Porada CD, Brink P"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
169148reference_contentRyaby JT. 1998. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and electric fields on fracture healing. Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 355:S205S215.[369.0, 914.0, 1145.0, 969.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Ryaby JT. 1998. Clinical effects of electromagnetic and elec"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
170149reference_contentShamos MH, Lavine LS, Shamos MI. 1963. Piezoelectric effect in bone. Nature 197:81.[367.0, 974.0, 1136.0, 1001.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Shamos MH, Lavine LS, Shamos MI. 1963. Piezoelectric effect "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1711410reference_contentSun LY, Hsieh DK, Yu TC, Chiu HT, Lu SF, Luo GH, Kuo TK, Lee OK, Chiou TW. 2009. Effect of pulsed electromagnetic field on the proliferation and differentiation potential of human bone marrow mesenchy[369.0, 1003.0, 1137.0, 1118.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Sun LY, Hsieh DK, Yu TC, Chiu HT, Lu SF, Luo GH, Kuo TK, Lee"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1721411reference_contentTandon N, Cannizzaro C, Chao PH, Maidhof R, Marsano A, Au HT, Radisic M, Vunjak-Novakovic G. 2009a. Electrical stimulation systems for cardiac tissue engineering. Nature Protocols 4:155173 DOI 10.103[370.0, 1124.0, 1091.0, 1209.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Tandon N, Cannizzaro C, Chao PH, Maidhof R, Marsano A, Au HT"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1731412reference_contentTandon N, Goh B, Marsano A, Chao PH, Montouri-Sorrentino C, Gimble J, Vunjak Novakovic G. 2009b. Alignment and elongation of human adipose-derived stem cells in response to direct-current electrical s[370.0, 1214.0, 1133.0, 1355.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Tandon N, Goh B, Marsano A, Chao PH, Montouri-Sorrentino C, "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
1741413reference_contentTofail SAM, Zhang Y, Gandhi AA. 2011. Piezoelectricity of bone from a new perspective. In: 2011 14th international symposium on electrets (Ise), 9192.[369.0, 1362.0, 1154.0, 1418.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Tofail SAM, Zhang Y, Gandhi AA. 2011. Piezoelectricity of bo"]reference_item0.85reference_zoneunknown_likenoneTrueTrue
1751414footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1501.0, 494.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_zonereference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
1761415number14/15[1109.0, 1503.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
177150headerPeerJ[62.0, 72.0, 155.0, 107.0]noise0.9["header label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse
178151reference_contentTsai MT, Li WJ, Tuan RS, Chang WH. 2009. Modulation of osteogenesis in human mesenchymal stem cells by specific pulsed electromagnetic field stimulation. Journal of Orthopaedic Research 27:11691174 D[371.0, 168.0, 1149.0, 252.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Tsai MT, Li WJ, Tuan RS, Chang WH. 2009. Modulation of osteo"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
179152reference_contentZhao Z, Watt C, Karystinou A, Roelofs AJ, McCaig CD, Gibson IR, De Bari C. 2011. Directed migration of human bone marrow mesenchymal stem cells in a physiological direct current electric field. Europe[370.0, 258.0, 1114.0, 368.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Zhao Z, Watt C, Karystinou A, Roelofs AJ, McCaig CD, Gibson "]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
180153reference_contentZhuang H, Wang W, Seldes RM, Tahernia AD, Fan H, Brighton CT. 1997. Electrical stimulation induces the level of TGF- $ \beta $1 mRNA in osteoblastic cells by a mechanism involving calcium/calmodulin p[370.0, 377.0, 1136.0, 490.0]reference_item0.85["reference content label: Zhuang H, Wang W, Seldes RM, Tahernia AD, Fan H, Brighton CT"]reference_item0.85reference_zonereference_likecitation_lineTrueTrue
181154footerMobini et al. (2017), PeerJ, DOI 10.7717/peerj.2821[64.0, 1502.0, 495.0, 1524.0]noise0.9["footer label"]noise0.9reference_zonereference_likereference_patternFalseFalse
182155number15/15[1108.0, 1503.0, 1158.0, 1522.0]noise0.9["page number label"]noise0.9unknown_likeshort_fragmentFalseFalse